My fifth installment of "Tales from the Mahabharata - Parikshit: Ego, Deja Vu" - was published in the Swarajya Magazine on December 2, 2014.
This is the full text of the article as it appeared:
This is the full text of the article as it appeared:
Let us take a brief look at the incidents that led to Parikshit’s demise.
King Parikshit was “always addicted to hunting, like the greatly fortunate warrior and great archer, Pandu.” (is the reference to Pandu—Parikshit’s great-grandfather—coincidental? Perhaps not. Pandu also was set on the road to his demise as a result of a hunting expedition gone wrong—this is described in the Sambhava upa Parva of the Adi Parva) During one such hunt, the 60-year-old king wounded a deer, and deep in its pursuit, found himself tired and thirsty, and came across a sage.
He asked him about the deer, but the sage did not reply as he had been observing a vow of silence. On not receiving a reply, Parikshit lost his temper, picked up a dead snake with his bow and placed it on the shoulders of the sage, and left. This act of the king was observed by a friend of the sage’s son and reported to him. Shringi, sage Shamika’s son, was “extremely powerful, with great energy and prone to extreme anger.” On hearing from his friend of his father’s insult, Shringi flew into a rage and cursed that “Within seven nights from now, the angry and radiant snake Takshaka will burn him down with the energy of his poison.” Shamika did not approve, but Shringi would not take his curse back, nor modify it. The sage then had a message sent to the king via a disciple, Gouramukha, and asked him to take all necessary precautions.
King Parikshit Hunting, Folio from a Ramayana King Parikshit Hunting, Folio from a Ramayana
Simple enough, so far? No. Not quite. Shringi’s friend was named Krisha. How did he convey the message of sage Shamika’s insult to Shringi? Note the words:
“O Shringi! Do not be too proud. You are an ascetic of great powers. But your father has got a carcass around his shoulders. Sons or rishis like us are successful, have knowledge of the brahman and are immersed in asceticism. But you should keep quiet. Where are your powers, your proud words and your arrogance when you see your father carrying a carcass?”
These were incendiary words, clearly meant to incite Shringi. Why did Krisha use these words? Not all friends are equal. Perhaps Krisha had a motive, or perhaps he was envious of Shringi’s powers. We don’t know. The Mahabharata does not say more on the topic.
Parikshit constructed a palace on pillars and had it guarded. As the seventh day dawned, sage Kashyapa headed towards Hastinapura to save King Parikshit—he had an antidote that could act against even the most virulent of poisons. Takshaka came across Kashyapa, and after witnessing the power of his knowledge, bought him off by giving him all the riches that he desired. Thus did Takshaka head towards Hastinapura. He sent some snakes in the form of brahmanas, bearing fruits as gifts for Parikshit, while he himself hid in one of the fruits. Parikshit’s guards were taken in by the disguise, and let in the brahmanas, who offered the fruits to the king and left.
At this point, the sun was close to setting. There was no sign of Takshaka, let alone any snakes. Parikshit was in an expansive, magnanimous mood. As he picked up a fruit, a small worm appeared in the fruit.
“Picking it up, the best of kings told his advisers, ‘The sun is setting. Today, I no longer have any fear from poison. Therefore, let this worm become Takshaka and bite me. Let the words of the hermit become true and let a falsehood not be committed.’…Having said this, the king of kings smilingly placed the small worm on his throat.”
Yes, in case you are wondering, Parikshit uttered these very words. What happened next requires no great imagination:
“He was still laughing when Takshaka, who had come out of the fruit that had been given to the king, coiled around him.”
The palace itself was set on fire from the virulence of Takshaka’s poison.
What did Parikshit do wrong? Insulting Shamika was of course one wrong. But after that, specifically, near his end, what did he do wrong? I can count at least three wrongs. All three can be attributed to his ego. First, the day was drawing to a close, but it was not yet over. Parikshit had let his hope overcome the need to stay on his guard till the very end. What harm could a few minutes do to him, or so he thought.
Second, Parikshit let himself believe that it was his prowess that had prevented Takshaka from getting to him, thus, inadvertently falsifying the words of Shringi—that had yet to happen, but in the mind of Parikshit, it was a deed as good as done. Therefore, having a small, harmless worm bite him was the noblest compromise. Third, and the most fatal of all, he invited Takshaka to bite him, literally. Note his choice of words—“let this worm become Takshaka and bite me.”
Famous last words, shall we say?
Note: I have used Dr. Bibek Debroy’s “Mahabharata”, Vol. 1, an unabridged English translation of the Critical Edition of the Mahabharata, published by Penguin India in 2010, for reference. The story here is described in the Astika upa Parva of the Adi Parva.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal.
© 2015, Abhinav Agarwal (अà¤िनव अग्रवाल). All rights reserved.
