Saturday, May 28, 2011

Talent Is Overrated

Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else
Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else (Kindle edition,, my review on
No prodigal, inborn talent. No silver bullet. No shortcuts. Hard work, focused, deliberate practice, a good teacher, and perseverance.

This is an outstanding book on excellence. Myth-busting yet liberating in the opportunities it lays open to the reader. Deserves to be read by one and all - and should be mandatory reading especially for parents I may suggest.
There are several books that talk about performance and the secrets, so to say, behind success and developing world-class skills. Amazon itself lists 119,049 books on the subject. There is even a magazine named "Success" on the topic. Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell is one recent book on the subject. This book, Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else, however is perhaps the best and most comprehensive look at what it takes to deliver world-class performance. Not deep, because the book does not delve into the neurological, psychological or other factors in depth that affect success. It does mention myelin, but only as a possible contributor to efficacy in performance, but something that has not been proven beyond doubt in its ability to affect performance in adults But comprehensive because it looks at almost all aspects of building world-class competencies, thinks of alternative explanations of genius, examines popular conceptions and misconceptions of genius, personalities through the ages thought to be endowed with some sort of a "genius" gene, medical explanations, and more.

The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology)The history of outstanding skills is not new. The thinking however has changed dramatically. From believing that everyone was born with an inborn, innate, fixed capacity for a certain level of performance to more modern thinking that believes outstanding skills are the composite result of several factors, all of which are within the grasp of most humans - there has been a significant change in mindsets. What however still persists is the popular belief that some people are "just born with talent", perpetuated by fatuous journalists looking for a story that is more exotic than the rather mundane "hard work" theory. You never got a successful headline that read "Long hours, hard work, focused practice - the secret of success." It is much easier for us to believe, and rather, very important for the preservation of our self-esteem, that success that attends the outstanding performers is not within the reach of us, "average" humans. If we had to believe that success is in our hands, then we would also have to believe that we did not work towards achieving it. Much more comforting to the ego to believe that outstanding talent is "inborn", that some people are "simply born with it", or that some are "just good with numbers", or that some "have a photographic memory".

What about the quaint but oft-repeated accusation against formal schooling? The one where people claim that schooling actually makes you less likely to "create" something? That schooling actually ends up making you no different from the others, a replica of each other, stamped from the assembly-line output of education factories? This is a oft-repeated accusation against schools, most often heard being spouted by armchair experts from the comfortable confines of headline seeking news outlets. The author begs to differ.
And what about evidence for the related notion that excessive schooling is correlated with lower creative achievement? ... Indeed, in many creative fields the person who pursues an advanced degree has consciously chosen a path that leads to a professorship, not to a life of innovating in that domain; it makes perfect sense that in these fields, those with the most years of formal schooling would be less eminent as innovators.
Innovation doesn't reject the past; on the contrary, it relies heavily on the past and comes most readily to those who've mastered the domain as it exists. [pages 155-157]

There does seem to be some scientific truth behind the assertion that it is easier to learn things when you are young.
A separate effect involves myelin, the substance that wraps slowly around neurons with practice, insulating and strengthening key connections in the brain. ... Starting early holds advantages that become less available later in life. [page 171]
Outliers: The Story of SuccessThis is something that the book, What's Going on in There? : How the Brain and Mind Develop in the First Five Years of Life, also describes. That myelin could play a vital role in helping strengthen these key connections, especially in the first few years of life. BUT, and the big but is that there is no evidence that the same holds true for people later on in life.
In the research, the poorest performers don't set goals at all; they just slog through their work. Mediocre performers set goals that are general and are often focused on simply achieving a good outcome... best performers make the most specific, technique-oriented plans.
The best performers observe themselves closely. They are in effect able to step outside themselves, monitor what is happening in their own minds, and ask how it's going. Researchers call this metacognition ...
Average performers believe their errors were caused by factors outside their control... Top performers, by contrast, believe they are responsible for their errors.
[pages 116-119]

There may well be a so-called "talent gene" that determines success and expertise in some particular area of activity, but "...All we can say for the moment is that no specific genes identifying particular talents have been found." [page 24]

Talent skeptics are careful to say that the evidence, taken together, doesn't prove that talent is a myth. They allow that further research could eventually show that individual genetic differences are what make the greatest performers so accomplished. But hundreds of studies conducted over decades have failed to show this. On the contrary, the preponderance of them have suggested very powerfully that genetic differences of this particular type - that is, differences that determine the highest levels of performance - don't exist. [page 25]

Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the Science of SuccessThere you go - as closely and as clearly as one can say in the language of science, that there is no evidence of a "talent gene". On the other hand, there is ample evidence, backed by rigorous scientific studies, that hard work pays.
On factor, and only one factor, predicted how musically accomplished the students were and that was how much they practiced. [page 18]

"The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance (PDF)", by Anders Ericsson, Ralf Th. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Romer proposed "a new theoretical framework for understanding why some people are so remarkably good at what they do."
In a study of chess players, Nobel Prize winner Herbert Simon and William Chase (Ericsson's coauthor on the memory study) proposed the "ten-year rule," ...
Subsequent research in a wide range of fields has substantiated the ten-year rule everywhere the researchers have looked. In math, science, musical composition, swimming, X-ray diagnosis, tennis, literature ...
... Many researchers and authors produce their greatest work only after twenty or more years of devoted effort
It could be put very simply: What the authors called "deliberate practice" makes all the difference. .. "the differences between expert performers and normal adults reflects a life-long period of deliberate effort to improve performance in a specific domain." [pages 61 - 63]

Deliberate practice is characterized by several elements.
It's designed specifically to improve performance. ... Decades or centuries of study have produced a body of knowledge about how performance in developed and improved ... At least in the early going, therefore, and sometimes long after, it's almost always necessary for a teacher to design the activity best suited to improve an individual's performance.

In general, well-designed practice, pursued for enough time, enables a person to circumvent the limitations that would otherwise hold back his or her performance, and circumventing limitations is the key to high performance at an advanced age. In a study of chess players, the older ones chose moves just as well as the younger ones, but they did it in a different way. They didn't consider as many possible moves because they couldn't; but they compensated through greater knowledge of positions. [pages 181-182]

The Talent Code: Greatness Isn't Born. It's Grown. Here's How.Praise at a young age can often be the single biggest motivator for a child to latch on to a particular skill at a task and hone it over the next ten or fifteen years into world-class expertise.
... as people start learning skills in virtually any field, they're typically compared not against the world's greatest performers in that field but against others their own age. ... Standing out at any given age is an excellent way to attract attention and praise, fueling the multiplier, and it can be done without relying on any innate ability. [page 202]

In closing:
But if you believe that your performance is forever limited by your lack of a specific innate gift, or by a lack of general abilities at a level that you think must be necessary, then there's no chance at all that you will do that work.
That's why this belief is tragically constraining. Everyone who has achieved exceptional performance has encountered terrible difficulties along the way. There are no exceptions. If you believe that doing the right kind of work can overcome the problems, then you have at least a chance of moving on to ever better performance. But those who see the setbacks as evidence that they lack the necessary gift will give up - quite logically, in light of their beliefs. [pages 205-206]
Talent Is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else (Kindle)

© 2011, Abhinav Agarwal. All rights reserved.

Idiots on roads - 5

The expression of the person sitting in a yogic posture atop the automotive contraption seems far removed from the happenings around him. The cover of the engine seems to have come left the the contraption sometime during the Quit India movement, while the doors look like they were optional accessories never availed of by the owner. The tires are as bald as Shetty's pate. The place is somewhere near Pataudi, which is somewhat between Gurgaon and Rewari.

© 2011, Abhinav Agarwal. All rights reserved.

Friday, May 27, 2011

Sunset outside Mysore Palace

Sunsets make for amazing vistas. I shot these last year, in December 2010, outside the Mysore Palace, at  6:18PM. The sun had set a short while back, we were making our way out of the palace, after having spent an enjoyable hour and a half inside it, having walked the premise of the palace and made a short visit to the Prasanna Krishna Swamy Temple inside the palace grounds, and the scattered clouds were reflecting the dying light from the setting sun in a most amazing manner.

I had to make sure to underexpose lest the whole sky come out washed out, with only a hint of orange in the resulting photo.

© 2011, Abhinav Agarwal. All rights reserved.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Taj Gateway Hotel, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore

There is a new Taj Gateway Hotel (Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) coming up on Bannerghatta Road, at the intersection of the JP Nagar Outer Ring Road that connects with the Kanakpura Road and then meets up with Mysore Road. Going by the state of the construction, it appears it will be at least the end of 2011 or the first of 2012 before the mall and the hotel are fully operational.

Apart from the Taj Hotel, there is also a mall that is gong to be co-located with the hotel, which will boast a bowling alley, a multi-plex by PVR, and stores by Spar (Spar India) and Lifestyle, among others. This promises to add to the growing number of malls on Bannerghatta Road. The other malls are the Gopalan Innovation and the Royal Meenakshi malls that have come up in the last six months.

View Larger Map

© 2011, Abhinav Agarwal. All rights reserved.

Nimishamba Temple, Srirangapatna

A minute is all the Goddess needs to fulfill your desires. So goes the myth and the legend. And that is the power of 'shakti'. The omnipotence of God and the intensity of the devotee can combine to produce instant results.
That is surely an incentive to make a beeline to the Goddess' temple. And so people do. The Nimishamba Temple, dedicated to the Goddess Nimishamba, considered an incarnation of Goddess Parvati, is located by the banks of the Cauvery river, in the historic town of Srirangapatna. This is a 10 minute drive from the Bangalore-Mysore highway on the way to Mysore, and is generally not as crowded as the more famous temple in Srirangapatna, the Ranganathswamy Temple (more on that later). There is no entry fee to the temple, but for a small charge of Rs 5 (I think) you can bypass the regular line, and get into a second queue, meant for "express darshan". There are also idols of Hanuman, Ganesha, and others. The temple itself is considered to be at least 400 years old, and if you are on a visit to Srirangapatna, this temple is well worth the short detour. Part of the stretch used to be a kaccha road (dirt road), but it has now been relaid as a nice two-laned road.

To the right of the temple is the Cauvery river, and from the temple there are steps that run down to the river. There are vendors hawking fruits and snacks, as well as vendors peddling children's toys.

The temple's coordinates are 12.41876N, 76.71065E

View Larger Map

© 2011, Abhinav Agarwal. All rights reserved.

Sunday, May 1, 2011

The Girl Who Played With Fire

The Girl Who Played with Fire

The Girl Who Played with Fire (Vintage)

(My review, all my reviews)

Lisbeth Salander, the trilogy's fiesty protaganist, is back, but not before she gets involved in straightening things out with a would-be wife-murderer. She makes her way back in Sweden, but finds herself at the scene and implicated in a triple murder, sort of on the run, and looking to seek out and settle scores with her antagonists. Blomkvist and Aramansky do not believe her to be guilty, and try to dig into the mess. We learn a lot more about Salander, her family, her background, and "All that evil" that happened in Salander's life when she was not even a teenager. There are several more characters in this plot than were in the first book, and it is not immediately clear what specific purpose they serve. However, the author takes pains to etch out each character with some detail, so that does make for interesting reading.

The book's first half is slower than the second. The plot moves but slowly, and at times you start wondering whether this second book is going to be anywhere as good to the first one. The second half picks up, and things start to happen fast. There are not as many surprises or completely unforeseen twists in this book as the first one, except maybe one.

This second book also takes aim at the underbelly of Sweden's society, and the cesspool of flesh trade that carries on, and it is not pleasant.

The ending of the second book sets up the third one very nicely. I can't wait to pick up the third book in the series. 

The Girl Who Played with Fire (Vintage)
 Search for The Girl Who Played With Fire
The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo


Buy The Girl Who PLayed With Fire from
Buy The Girl Who PLayed With Fire from

© 2010, Abhinav Agarwal. All rights reserved.